Hi davx,
I know the 3 methods are valid. I was just wondering if 1 of the 3 would have been a better method? And why? I'm fine with method 1. I think method 3 is probably better than method 2.
The confusion part is how input/mixer behave when several conditions are true at the same time.
For INPUT, it is working the same way than "if ... else if... else ...". So last line will be a default one (which is a good rule).
But for MIXER, if you are using REPLACE and if 2 (or more) conditions are true at the same time, then it will be the last line which will win (same as: a=10;a=18;a=4; The result will be a is 4, last one wins).
I started to have some headaches...
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Another question is: "how to chose if the programming must be done in INPUT or MIXER ?". INPUT got the advantage to easily ensure there is a default condition (to not lose the model control).
Maybe I'm asking myself too much philosophical questions...
However, somebody gives me a good reason to prefer method 2/3 against method 1: the usage of some advance trainer mode (ex: Ail, replaced by TR1).
PS: Your are correct. When I created the model for this example, I've done a mistake. It should have been
Thr, not
Rud. In method 1, I also forgot to remove the Thr trim for one condition (I never using Thr trim with electrical model).